Hmm… Intra-day swing trading seems to be the way to go. Shouldn’t limit oneself to simply day trading. But why does everything always comes back to predicting the future…
It will be difficult to pull the trigger if the Gematria/Numerology does not line up properly. Let’s take a look at $TOCA and how it has jumped up and how theoretically we could have capitalized on this situation:
$TOCA
On 2/20 this stock started to gap up. This date had 62/26 numerology. First of all, it seems unrealistic to call that this stock would move on this day, unless I was watching it previously, and even if I was, there are too many variables to accurately say whether or not this number specifically is the one that this movement/volatility will trigger on.
This theoretically is where the ‘swing’ trading aspect comes in, as we can now project into the future and see if any coming days could ‘boost’ this movement through alignments.
Even though this stock had ‘alignments,’ it wasn’t volatile, it just gapped up. Near the end of the day, however, it did veer into the bullish side, and ended near the HOD:
What concepts were merging together, that would potentially allow us to pull the trigger on a swing trade, and hold until tomorrow (perhaps all day or multiple days?):
- Volume surge
- Broke through previous high
- The following Monday, 2/24, would be 23 weeks 4 days since the stock crashed, and
- The stock has ‘room’ to go to about $3.00, the upcoming resistance:
A reason not to hold over the entire weekend, and perhaps only 2/21, would be because it would be over the weekend… That doesn’t seem like a great idea, currently, but I can accept that this may be my inexperience talking.
UPDATE: A solution to this would be to sell 80% of my shares and hold the 20% over the weekend. If the stock did fail, however, in the next day, what are the chances of it dropping to less than $0.50? There would still be great risk for a small account, though. Ideally, a $10,000 account would be required, so the following example would be 10% of the account:
- Buy 1k shares at $0.80 for a total of $800
- Stop loss at $0.46, creating a $360 risk
- Hold overnight
- Sell next day at $1.80 (account for slippage & not holding passed the $1.00 per share profit mark to lock in profits)
- That would be +$800 in profits
- Remaining 200 share position
- If the stock dropped to the $1.00 range on Monday, 2/24, I could sell and still in the green
- 200 shares x $0.20 = $40
- Total of $840.00
Let’s make another example, with a $400 position:
- $0.80 x 500 shares = $400
- Stop loss at $0.46, creating a $184 risk
- 80% of 500 = 80/100 x 500 = 400 shares
- Sell 400 shares at $1.80 for $400 profit
- Remaining 100 shares to hold over weekend
- On Monday, 2/24, if price drops, get out for +$0.20 shares if possible
- 100 shares x $0.20 = $20
- Total profit: $420
The second example is more reasonable and manages risk better than the previous example, in the case of a small account, i.e., smaller than $10,000 – $20,000 account. The difference in risk is $176 dollars (or 17.6% in the case of a $1000 account), and the difference in profit is $420. Of course, greater risk = greater reward, there is no need to risk 42.00% of a $1000 account… A $10,000 account, however, that risk would be 4.20%, so still doable for an experienced trader.
Jared Wesley made a good point in one of his videos (Difference between intra-day trading and swing trading, in that intra-day trading is income producing, and swing trading is wealth creating. It is imperative to look at long-term as well as short-term gains to truly grow and account. Yes, in a small account taking a large swing position would be very high risk… but hopefully in a few months I will have learnt enough to make future calls like this. Along with the knowledge of Gematria, this could form very strong convergences of multiple concepts and allow for great gains, greater than intra-day 2-4R profits.
But I should be very careful… I don’t want to become this:
Incredibly, this article released on 12/23/2019
This news of course could be fake, but what allows us to see if this is legit predictive programming (in a sense) or not?
The day after this stock started to gap up by $1.20, on the date 2/21, this news had been out for 1 month 30 days:
Notice that the article literally contains those letters in those orders, and it is in English Ordinal to boot… Of course as has been obvious over the past 1 or 2 months of observing top % gainers, stocks that have alignments in ordinal, or full reduction, reverse ordinal or reverse full reduction are usually in the top % gainers. Mathematic ciphers as well as the Jewish cipher hold a lot of weight, but the ordinal values is really where the the majority of these alignments are, for now.
Perhaps, along with market /volatility, the ciphers will change in weight as well. Something to keep in mind.
Anyway, this date of the news, 12/23 the stock did not move at all:
It was at $0.47, though, on a date which had 47 numerology:
The alignments were there in these ciphers, but it didn’t move… Enough for news predicting future movement though… This plays a factor since the date 2/24 will have an alignment in the Sumerian cipher, so perhaps the stock does not continue to climb. It would be a former runner though.
The date this stock gapped, 2/20, they did have a conference call at 8:30 a.m. ET. This was following the news on 2/19 of a merger with Forte Biosciences:
This merger news was announced on 2/19:
TOCA is merging with Forte Biosciences:
Now… the day after the conference, 2/21, when the stock shot up $1.20, was 23 weeks 2 days after the stock had crashed:
This merger was announced on 16 numerology:
Hmm… It does have interesting numbers popping up for the next week…………. I’ll keep an eye on this and update this post in the following week.
UPDATE: I just saw something… I should have seen this earlier… The day after the initial gap up was 2/21:
This would add extra strength to the argument of buying shares on 2/20, and holding overnight into the next day. It may have even been good to hold some shares all the way till Monday, or 2/24, because that date has numerology of 12:
UPDATE
Did not continue the uptrend (for now), realistically would have closed position: